https://creativecommons.org/2023/03/24/style-copyright-and-generative-ai-part-2-vicarious-liability/ This goes into who should be liable. I disagree, again, given the DVD Jon precedent (Hacker ‘DVD Jon’ Goes on Trial | WIRED). In that case, the…
https://creativecommons.org/2023/03/23/the-complex-world-of-style-copyright-and-generative-ai/ Copyright historically has not covered style until recent legal action. The Marvin Gaye Estate vs. Pharell Willians and Robin Thicke (Marvin Gaye estate vs Robin Thicke and…
It is a limited study, but it does show the gap that a novice may miss. This will be closed as the companies can retrain and isolate domains…
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-lawmakers-lay-groundwork-for-historic-ai-regulation/a-65909881 6% of global revenues is a real penalty. GDPR had ripples because of a similar penalty scheme. It is time this approach for penalties is adopted globally…
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/01/microsoft_github_copilot/ It is interesting to see that they know they are violating licenses by slightly changing code to obfuscate the origin. That kind of deliberate behavior gets full…
https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/28/microsoft_openai_sued_privacy/ First co-pilot causes a suit based on violating open source licenses, therefore copyright infringement. Artists are suing as a class. Now privacy concerns are in the legal…
Bruce Schneier post: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2023/06/ethical-problems-in-computer-security.html
https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/21/openai_government_regulation/
https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/19/even_google_warns_its_own/ Apparently they can’t trust it even though they tell people they can trust it. Wonder what code it is trained on that it can’t be trusted?